![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
curious about fanart style preferences
artwork in traditional media that is very realistic in style and used identifiable promo/screencap images as reference, e.g. many realist character portrait paintings/drawings or collage paintings that merge several portrait images for effect (like a collage of canon h/c scenes)
Mean: 2.57 Median: 3 Std. Dev 1.32
0 | 4 (8.2%) | |
---|---|---|
1 | 5 (10.2%) | |
2 | 15 (30.6%) | |
3 | 13 (26.5%) | |
4 | 8 (16.3%) | |
5 | 4 (8.2%) |
the same but done with digital media, e.g. "paintovers" and such
Mean: 2.10 Median: 2 Std. Dev 1.42
0 | 8 (16.3%) | |
---|---|---|
1 | 10 (20.4%) | |
2 | 11 (22.4%) | |
3 | 11 (22.4%) | |
4 | 7 (14.3%) | |
5 | 2 (4.1%) |
artwork in traditional media that is very realistic in style but shows fully imaginary scenes rather than character portraits and drawings based canon scenes
Mean: 4.14 Median: 4 Std. Dev 0.99
0 | 0 (0.0%) | |
---|---|---|
1 | 1 (2.0%) | |
2 | 1 (2.0%) | |
3 | 12 (24.5%) | |
4 | 11 (22.4%) | |
5 | 24 (49.0%) |
the same but done with digital media
Mean: 4.06 Median: 4 Std. Dev 1.13
0 | 1 (2.0%) | |
---|---|---|
1 | 1 (2.0%) | |
2 | 1 (2.0%) | |
3 | 11 (22.4%) | |
4 | 12 (24.5%) | |
5 | 23 (46.9%) |
artwork in traditional media that is basically still realist (e.g. in proportions etc.) but more stylized, e.g. characters rendered in art noveau style, a realistic comic style etc.
Mean: 4.45 Median: 5 Std. Dev 0.83
0 | 0 (0.0%) | |
---|---|---|
1 | 0 (0.0%) | |
2 | 2 (4.1%) | |
3 | 5 (10.2%) | |
4 | 11 (22.4%) | |
5 | 31 (63.3%) |
the same but done with digital media
Mean: 4.35 Median: 5 Std. Dev 1.04
0 | 1 (2.0%) | |
---|---|---|
1 | 0 (0.0%) | |
2 | 2 (4.1%) | |
3 | 5 (10.2%) | |
4 | 11 (22.4%) | |
5 | 30 (61.2%) |
manga-style artwork
Mean: 2.90 Median: 3 Std. Dev 1.40
0 | 3 (6.2%) | |
---|---|---|
1 | 6 (12.5%) | |
2 | 8 (16.7%) | |
3 | 13 (27.1%) | |
4 | 12 (25.0%) | |
5 | 6 (12.5%) |
cartoony artwork
Mean: 3.69 Median: 4 Std. Dev 1.26
0 | 1 (2.1%) | |
---|---|---|
1 | 2 (4.2%) | |
2 | 5 (10.4%) | |
3 | 11 (22.9%) | |
4 | 13 (27.1%) | |
5 | 16 (33.3%) |
photomanips of the collage-type, e.g. multiple pictures from canon and non-canon sources are arranged, layered, changed with textures etc.
Mean: 2.16 Median: 2 Std. Dev 1.40
0 | 6 (12.2%) | |
---|---|---|
1 | 13 (26.5%) | |
2 | 8 (16.3%) | |
3 | 14 (28.6%) | |
4 | 5 (10.2%) | |
5 | 3 (6.1%) |
photomanips of the type that merges/blends pictures into a single non-collage image, e.g. putting characters in period costumes, giving characters wings, head/body mergers to get explicit art etc.
Mean: 2.18 Median: 2 Std. Dev 1.38
0 | 7 (14.3%) | |
---|---|---|
1 | 10 (20.4%) | |
2 | 9 (18.4%) | |
3 | 15 (30.6%) | |
4 | 6 (12.2%) | |
5 | 2 (4.1%) |
digital artwork that is not painted or manipped but primarily 3D rendered
Mean: 1.49 Median: 1 Std. Dev 1.24
0 | 13 (28.9%) | |
---|---|---|
1 | 10 (22.2%) | |
2 | 12 (26.7%) | |
3 | 7 (15.6%) | |
4 | 3 (6.7%) | |
5 | 0 (0.0%) |
ETA: I probably should have been more precise in that what I'm curious about is preferences for styles of 2D, non-moving picture-type fanart; the phrasing was not meant to imply that things like fannish fiber crafts, sculpture or vidding or other arts weren't "fanart".