RatCreature (
ratcreature) wrote2007-08-06 01:40 am
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Entry tags:
IBARW -- kind of a local topic I guess
Sometimes I see posts in fandom racism discussions from non-US fans that seem to think that the legacy of slavery was somehow just an US issue, and didn't have much relevance to racism elsewhere and the forms it takes.
Maybe there are places like that somewhere, I don't know, but the history of slavery is not an "US-centric" issue. I think more often than not colonial history is just glossed over. Not just with regard to profiteering from slavery of course, for example in my high school history lessons of German colonial expansion the Herero and Namaqua genocide was barely mentioned, otoh there are still colonial monuments and street names in German cities honoring colonial troops that committed atrocities often without even mentioning their victims at all, as would be appropriate in a more critical and modern approach to monuments dealing with the colonial history.
But it it not just some historical legacy of monuments for war deaths and such: My hometown is Hamburg and there's this neighborhood, called Wandsbek, which used to be an independent town before the city's administration, districts and government were restructured in 1937. Anyway, that town had this fairly prominent citizen, a merchant who did much to make it grow, and himself rich (and to some degree the town too). Hence there are several streets named for him, and in 2006 the district administration erected a bust and a plaque in his honor.
That merchant was Heinrich Carl Schimmelmann (1724-1782) and he got rich through slave trade. He became one of the richest people in Europe at the time, kept slaves himself, and further profitted from exploiting orphaned children in his cotton factory and serfs on his farm estate.
And they gave him a newly erected bust last autumn, To make it worse, the way the memorial plaque text is phrased is beyond offensive, not because were trying to hide that Schimmelmann was a slave trader, but because it simply lists the humans he kidnapped and enslaved alongside the other trade goods, and that is the only way it addresses slavery. On that plaque, there's an explanation that the basis of his wealth was acquired through through supplying the military during the Seven Year War, and then the phrasing of the only sentence in which slavery is mentioned on the plate is "Auch durch den so genannten Dreieckshandel (Kattun und Gewehre, Sklaven, Zuckerrohr und Baumwolle) zwischen Europa, Afrika und Amerika galt er als reichster Mann Europas." (that translates as: "Also through the so called triangle trade (calico and rifles, slaves, sugar cane and cotton) between Europe, Africa and America he was said to be the richest man in Europe.") The sentence after that goes on to praise his charity work, and that he consolidated the Danish state finances.
The following link is in German, but you can look at photos of the bust and plaque, and of the protests agaist it that were organized by the black community in Hamburg on this site that's part of a project to increase awareness of German colonial history through, among other things, performance art involving colonial monuments.
Anyway, that bust was erected in September 2006, to celebrate the slave trader making that town richer, praising the pretty buildings he erected with his blood money, and what a great citizen he was. Despite protests of various NGOs, the local black community, parts of the press and two of the parties forming the minority in the district parliament, the district administration refused to remove or change that memorial into something more appropriate and less racist. I think, the protests and actions against this are still ongoing (like for example critical, anti-colonialist city tours offered for tourists are still drawing attention to this), sometimes even noticed by the media, like back in April this year when Arte (a French-German public tv channel) did a brief feature on the tenth local black history month here (which I think is less official than its counterpart in the US, but it does exist), and mentioned it. (You can watch a German recording of it on YouTube here.)
So to my mind the history of slavery and more awareness of it and the connected history is relevant to me locally, even though I'm outside the US.
Maybe there are places like that somewhere, I don't know, but the history of slavery is not an "US-centric" issue. I think more often than not colonial history is just glossed over. Not just with regard to profiteering from slavery of course, for example in my high school history lessons of German colonial expansion the Herero and Namaqua genocide was barely mentioned, otoh there are still colonial monuments and street names in German cities honoring colonial troops that committed atrocities often without even mentioning their victims at all, as would be appropriate in a more critical and modern approach to monuments dealing with the colonial history.
But it it not just some historical legacy of monuments for war deaths and such: My hometown is Hamburg and there's this neighborhood, called Wandsbek, which used to be an independent town before the city's administration, districts and government were restructured in 1937. Anyway, that town had this fairly prominent citizen, a merchant who did much to make it grow, and himself rich (and to some degree the town too). Hence there are several streets named for him, and in 2006 the district administration erected a bust and a plaque in his honor.
That merchant was Heinrich Carl Schimmelmann (1724-1782) and he got rich through slave trade. He became one of the richest people in Europe at the time, kept slaves himself, and further profitted from exploiting orphaned children in his cotton factory and serfs on his farm estate.
And they gave him a newly erected bust last autumn, To make it worse, the way the memorial plaque text is phrased is beyond offensive, not because were trying to hide that Schimmelmann was a slave trader, but because it simply lists the humans he kidnapped and enslaved alongside the other trade goods, and that is the only way it addresses slavery. On that plaque, there's an explanation that the basis of his wealth was acquired through through supplying the military during the Seven Year War, and then the phrasing of the only sentence in which slavery is mentioned on the plate is "Auch durch den so genannten Dreieckshandel (Kattun und Gewehre, Sklaven, Zuckerrohr und Baumwolle) zwischen Europa, Afrika und Amerika galt er als reichster Mann Europas." (that translates as: "Also through the so called triangle trade (calico and rifles, slaves, sugar cane and cotton) between Europe, Africa and America he was said to be the richest man in Europe.") The sentence after that goes on to praise his charity work, and that he consolidated the Danish state finances.
The following link is in German, but you can look at photos of the bust and plaque, and of the protests agaist it that were organized by the black community in Hamburg on this site that's part of a project to increase awareness of German colonial history through, among other things, performance art involving colonial monuments.
Anyway, that bust was erected in September 2006, to celebrate the slave trader making that town richer, praising the pretty buildings he erected with his blood money, and what a great citizen he was. Despite protests of various NGOs, the local black community, parts of the press and two of the parties forming the minority in the district parliament, the district administration refused to remove or change that memorial into something more appropriate and less racist. I think, the protests and actions against this are still ongoing (like for example critical, anti-colonialist city tours offered for tourists are still drawing attention to this), sometimes even noticed by the media, like back in April this year when Arte (a French-German public tv channel) did a brief feature on the tenth local black history month here (which I think is less official than its counterpart in the US, but it does exist), and mentioned it. (You can watch a German recording of it on YouTube here.)
So to my mind the history of slavery and more awareness of it and the connected history is relevant to me locally, even though I'm outside the US.
no subject
no subject
no subject
(Actually, one of my favorite posts last year was one of Veejane's: she wrote eloquently about race in baseball, an area about which I know very little, and it was a fascinating read.)
no subject
no subject
no subject
This was a great example of IBARW writing, BTW, and a great rebuttal of that "Oh, that is the US's problem!" meme I'd been seeing around. Thanks for writing it.
no subject
It really bugs me, the way I keep hearing "this is an American issue!" from people in countries that I know have an extensive history of both racism and slavery. In HP fandom, many fans compared the house-elves' situation to that of African slaves, and were shouted down with "Don't be stupid! JKR is British!" And all I could do was go "Bwuh? Do you think slavery magically appeared in the US overnight the day the Declaration of Independence was signed?"
no subject
no subject
"Triangle trade" auf englisch. ;)
no subject
no subject
no subject
Here via IBARW
Thank you for this post.
Re: Here via IBARW
no subject
no subject
no subject
I think for Germans the idea of "Yeah, there were some people who at some point got rich off it" just doesn't feel all that heavy weight compared to gassing gypsies. But when we start on that we again start comparing different kinds of traumas (what is worse? Killing people on the sport for a relatively short time? Keeping them alive and taking away their identity for a longer period of time? I actually find it fascinating how similar some of the personal Aufarbeitungs-testimonies sound as people try to come to terms with what happened them and how they were forced into this huge organized machinery that just didn't consider them *people*).
That said, German colonial history has always sounded really creepy to me, probably precisely because not much gets talked about it.
no subject
no subject
Though I think monuments are a rather tricky thing most of times. Pretty much most big war heroes can be seen as mass murderers. Better stick to busts of musicians and poets. At least there the worst you can find out is that they beat their wives or took drugs. Or, you know, believed in racist propaganda.
Wait, upon rethinking I think all monuments we have should be of trees. And I actually mean that only in a half-joking way at all. At least trees are prettier than the average historical celebrity anyway.
no subject
I wonder how many other western European nations have such histories? More important, did I sleep though all my history classes in school, or was this never addressed?
Thank you for writing this.
no subject
ETA: They have removed that bust last fall though afaik, so the ongoing local protests had some success after all. There was no apology for putting it up in the first place or anything, and they were quiet abput the removal, but it's not there anymore.