RatCreature (
ratcreature) wrote2008-03-18 08:20 pm
Aaargh.
I'm so frustrated. I'm in the process of drawing an illustration for Trinityofone's SGA/HDM story Dæmonology, and it has John and Teyla and their respective daemons sparring with each other and you can see Ronon's and Rodney's dæmons watching (these two themselves are somehow offscreen), and it's been an exercise in frustration.
There's the two humans fighting in the background plus a snake and a mongoose in action in the center, a wolf and a mouse watching in the foreground, with their relative sizes dependent on perspective, then there's the stupid foreshortening making everything harder, and I've been trying to get the rough pencils finished for *days* now. (Yes I'm that slow/inept.)
I suck at perspective. I tried constructing their relative sizes in relation to the eyelevel, and so on, but it never quite works. I've done all the different elements several times now, I have like twelve pages with sketched people and animals by now, sometimes everything, sometimes just one part, and I think I arrived at something that doesn't look too horribly wrong, though it doesn't really fit completely with my perspective help line constructions either, but now I'm wondering whether I should just proceed or go to find some knowledgeable artbeta opinion pointing out the errors.
I mean, I'm not sure if I'd have the motivation to start over yet again, if it was seriously wrong. I just want to finally get to the fun parts of drawing the details, and then inking and coloring it, because I am sick of mentally rotating cubes for foreshortening and to figure out relative sizes and such. This is supposed to be fun, right? Who cares about perspective... (gah, I'm starting to sound like the people posting their fanfic without a spell check. *cringes*)
I hate perspective and foreshortening so much. (I know I would probably hate these less if I practiced more, but I'm lazy.)
There's the two humans fighting in the background plus a snake and a mongoose in action in the center, a wolf and a mouse watching in the foreground, with their relative sizes dependent on perspective, then there's the stupid foreshortening making everything harder, and I've been trying to get the rough pencils finished for *days* now. (Yes I'm that slow/inept.)
I suck at perspective. I tried constructing their relative sizes in relation to the eyelevel, and so on, but it never quite works. I've done all the different elements several times now, I have like twelve pages with sketched people and animals by now, sometimes everything, sometimes just one part, and I think I arrived at something that doesn't look too horribly wrong, though it doesn't really fit completely with my perspective help line constructions either, but now I'm wondering whether I should just proceed or go to find some knowledgeable artbeta opinion pointing out the errors.
I mean, I'm not sure if I'd have the motivation to start over yet again, if it was seriously wrong. I just want to finally get to the fun parts of drawing the details, and then inking and coloring it, because I am sick of mentally rotating cubes for foreshortening and to figure out relative sizes and such. This is supposed to be fun, right? Who cares about perspective... (gah, I'm starting to sound like the people posting their fanfic without a spell check. *cringes*)
I hate perspective and foreshortening so much. (I know I would probably hate these less if I practiced more, but I'm lazy.)

no subject
no subject
I think so. You should be able to do that by getting all of their feet levels closer together - that lowers the viewpoint. lemme see if I can get a workable sketch...
no subject
Minimal changes - it uses all your elements, and the difference in position isn't all that large. (http://pics.livejournal.com/astridv/pic/000b5qxs)
also same elements, slightly rearranged (http://pics.livejournal.com/astridv/pic/000b4e3h)
no subject
no subject
http://www.ratcreature.net/fanart/daemon-inks_screenres.jpg
no subject
Oh, sure, that'd be cool. Not necessary, but definitely appreciated.
There are people who don't like being credited that way?
Looks good, btw. Looking forward to seeing it colored.
no subject
Yeah, I've seen it more for fanfic, but since most meta issues are similar, and just fanart less often discussed I assume etiquette to be similar as a rule. It mostly happens when someone asks for a beta reader, and then the author heeds only some suggestions, or rewrites things more afterwards, and the beta doesn't get to "sign off" on the final result, but because they provided assistance the author thanks them, so their name ends up on a story that may have typos or weaknesses and they are embarrassed to see their name associated with it. I've seen quite a bit of outrage over that, and the consensus in those discussions seemed to be that it is a social faux pas to mention that someone helped without asking for permission to connect them to the end result first.
The opportunities to give offense in fandom without meaning to are endless.