ratcreature: argh (argh)
RatCreature ([personal profile] ratcreature) wrote2003-06-22 12:39 am

rotfl

There are some things that could only happen in TS fandom. Like a gen archive posting policies on "bonding fic":

"[...] In the future, CL will no longer archive or link to stories that contain bonding scenes which could be as viewed as homoerotic. This includes stories in which the characters remove key articles of clothing or physically "bond" in a manner that implies near-sexual content. Specific examples of this would include (but are not limited to) total nakedness of either/both characters, touching/physical contact over private areas of the body, sensations which could be construed as an orgasm, and mention of implied sexual attraction between characters of the same sex. [...]"
thornsilver: (Default)

[personal profile] thornsilver 2003-06-21 05:43 pm (UTC)(link)
Are they suggesting there can be no gen stories with bound characters?

*Thinks about the "Dark Guide" series. Withdraws remark.*

[identity profile] basingstoke.livejournal.com 2003-06-21 07:23 pm (UTC)(link)
I'm just picturing the onlist arguments now...

"Damn those slashers for making statements of love while holding each other in the nude homoerotic! It was never like that before their dirty, dirty minds!"
ext_841: (darksphinx)

[identity profile] cathexys.livejournal.com 2003-06-21 07:28 pm (UTC)(link)
lol...yes, that's always been one of the odd things about smarm, hasn't it (yet again a concept only in ts, though tpm would have made a good playing ground for such fics as well...why didn't it???)...i know i've read entire pages long sex scenes that purported to be physical, intellectual, and emotional bonding yet not sex *g*

[identity profile] executrix.livejournal.com 2003-06-22 07:05 am (UTC)(link)
Replying to [livejournal.com profile] cathexys
1. Blakes7 smarm does exist (I've even written some of it)--however, I don't know if any fandom except Xena has Ubers.
2. "Entire pages long sex scenes thatpurported to be physical, intellectual, and emotional bonding yet not sex"--WNGWJLEO Squared?

Re:

[identity profile] executrix.livejournal.com 2003-06-22 08:26 am (UTC)(link)
Violence is often considered cleaner than sex, so remember: if one guy is whipping another one, it's gen if he doesn't like it and slash if he does.

The reason I don't like h/c is that it often seems to me that the author is punishing her puppets for her own ambivalence about the situations in which it is OK for her to "watch" men's bodies in close juxtaposition.
ext_1843: (yinyang)

[identity profile] cereta.livejournal.com 2003-06-22 07:50 am (UTC)(link)
*Snort*

*Snorfle*

Heeeeeee.

I'm so picturing the "What do you mean, sexual? DOn't you believe in True Friendship?" repsonse.