RatCreature (
ratcreature) wrote2009-04-21 03:50 am
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Entry tags:
revising my internal "best of pairing smooshes" list...
Up to now I've thought that "Snermione" was the most unfortunate smooshed pairing name I've seen "in the wild" (i.e. used by someone unironically just to name the pairing rather than in posts mocking the most hilarious potential name combinations), but I think I may have to revise this in light of having just seen "Spirk" on a story search. I'm not completely sure what I object to in particular, except that calling it "Kock" would be as easy to pronounce, even funnier and comply with the traditional K/S order. Seriously though, "Spirk"?!?
no subject
(no subject)
Spirk
Spirk, I have to say, makes me think of spunk - and not the Nancy Drew kind.
Re: Spirk
no subject
But, seriously, Spirk is terrible. Maybe it was a joke?
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
(no subject)
no subject
One word: LOGURT
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
(no subject)
no subject
I'm holding out for "Spork".
I can't figure out if Snermione is worse than Snupin (which I keep mistyping as "Snupid" ... oh dear). Actually, any pairing with Snape is pretty much doomed to create incredibly silly smoosh-names.
(no subject)
no subject
Also: Logurt? Eeep.
(no subject)
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)