indecisive

May. 2nd, 2011 03:37 pm
ratcreature: Your devoted minion. (minion)
I've recced Tolkien fanart last month for [community profile] fanart_recs, but haven't yet decided what I could rec in May. Thus a poll:

Poll #6841 what to rec?
Open to: Registered Users, detailed results viewable to: All, participants: 11


Which fandom should RatCreature rec this month on fanart_recs?

View Answers

DC Comics
5 (45.5%)

Harry Potter
2 (18.2%)

Star Wars
4 (36.4%)

ratcreature: RatCreature enjoys food: yum! (food)
I've been wondering about carnivorous habits, and which animals people eat and which they avoid, thus a poll. (Vegetarians like me, feel free to answer for a period of your life when you ate animals. Obviously if you have never eaten any the poll is kind of moot.) For each you can pick a number from 0 to 3, where 0 = "I have never eaten this animal" (or an animal from a that group, as I bundled some), 1 = "I've tried it only once or twice", 2 = "I have been/am eating this every now and then" (e.g. animals you eat repeatedly but only on rare occasions, or as a treat), 3 = "this animal was/is a regular part of my diet".
cut for length )

random poll

Mar. 4th, 2011 08:47 pm
ratcreature: RatCreature enjoys food: yum! (food)
Most people think chocolate and nuts go well together, but which nut do you think fits chocolate best? (Today when I decided to buy some chocolate with nuts I dithered for minutes in front of the shelf over whether I ought to go with hazelnut or almond chocolate this time.)

I realize radio buttons make this hard when like me you like many nuts in chocolate, but you'll just have to pick a favorite. (Feel free to imagine the chocolate however you like it to best compliment the nuts, i.e. if you like for example hazelnuts best in milk chocolate but almonds in dark chocolate, imagine the combination you like better and then pick the kind of nut in the poll.)

Poll #6193 chocolate & nuts
Open to: Registered Users, detailed results viewable to: All, participants: 51


Which nut do you like best with chocolate?

View Answers

None: Who would contaminate tasty chocolate with any nut?? (or nuts with chocolate)
5 (9.8%)

Hazelnuts
21 (41.2%)

Almonds
16 (31.4%)

Walnuts
1 (2.0%)

Pecans
2 (3.9%)

Macadamia
2 (3.9%)

Cashew
2 (3.9%)

Brazil nuts
0 (0.0%)

Pistachios
0 (0.0%)

Peanuts (counted as "nut" for the purposes of this poll despite being an undercover legume)
2 (3.9%)

some other nut you have forgotten
0 (0.0%)

ratcreature: RatCreature as a sloth (sloth)
Like many other people, especially those without a dish washer, I'm not fond of doing dishes, and due to me lacking in discipline the dirty ones pile up, and I get to the point where no clean plate/fork/mug... is to be found when I need such an item to prepare and eat the food I want. And yet this does not always result in me just doing the dishes. So I'm curious about others.

Poll #5895 (not) doing dishes, how do fellow sloths cope?
Open to: Registered Users, detailed results viewable to: All, participants: 53


How do you cope with a lack of clean dishes/cutlery?

View Answers

I never let my dirty dishes accumulate to such an extent in the first place.
15 (28.3%)

Once it's come to that point I give in and just do the dishes.
32 (60.4%)

I invite over someone who I know can't tolerate the sight of piled up dishes, and hope they'll volunteer to (help) clean up.
4 (7.5%)

That's what the reserve stash of paper plates and plastic sporks is for.
10 (18.9%)

I go out to eat elsewhere.
8 (15.1%)

I switch to eating food that can be prepared/eaten without the dishes/cutlery. (Or eat things that way regardless of custom.)
14 (26.4%)

I wash the single plate/fork/mug/whatever I need and leave the rest.
22 (41.5%)

If still possible I use related items that are clean if not ideally suited (e.g. all forks are dirty so I make do with a cake fork, or use a large plate instead of a small one etc.)
24 (45.3%)

I try to find a used item that might still be reasonably clean enough to be used again without washing it.
9 (17.0%)

I buy new dishes/cutlery.
0 (0.0%)

ratcreature: RatCreature is bored. (bored)
I once again failed to convince my rats of the merits of being still to let me cuddle them for longer than three or four scritches...

Poll #5584 rate your pets' cuddliness...
Open to: Registered Users, detailed results viewable to: All, participants: 35


How willing to cuddle is (are) your pet(s)?

View Answers

It is not the kind you cuddle (e.g. racing cockroaches or fish or the like).
1 (2.9%)

It won't tolerate petting or cuddling at all.
1 (2.9%)

It lets me pet it sometimes. If I'm lucky.
5 (14.3%)

I can bribe it with food to let itself be petted.
2 (5.7%)

If I force-cuddle it, it usually holds still and endures it.
4 (11.4%)

It voluntarily lets me cuddle and pet it for a short while, if I initiate.
7 (20.0%)

It sometimes voluntarily comes to me and initiates cuddling itself, but not for long.
9 (25.7%)

It initiates or even demands lengthy cuddles, but only on its own terms.
18 (51.4%)

My pet loves to cuddle at almost all times.
11 (31.4%)

It's not so much that it likes cuddles, as that it likes to sleep in a warm and soft spot that happens to be me.
16 (45.7%)

I dislike cuddling my pet, so this is avoided from my end, and I couldn't say what its preferences are.
0 (0.0%)

ratcreature: RatCreature is thinking: hmm...? (hmm...?)
I'm sure most people are familiar with the situation that when you look back at works of any kind (writing, art, crafts, whatever) that you finished some time ago, you come across one for which you still find the idea/concept really awesome, but now you kind of cringe at the technical execution, or at least some of it, because you've gotten better with practice since, and if you realized the same idea now, it could have been so much better. And while you still know that you were really proud of it then, and still love the concept behind it, the less accomplished realization now almost seems like a waste of a great idea.

And then some people may redo their old work if they find an idea compelling enough, i.e. rewrite that old novel in a second version, redo a painting, etc., while others may revisit similar themes or mine their old work for ideas, but don't go back to finished things to do the same thing again, just better. Personally I'm in the second "camp" and don't think I've ever done a remake version, but I wonder how others feel, thus a poll:

Poll #5503 remaking your works
Open to: Registered Users, detailed results viewable to: All, participants: 18


Do you ever redo old works?

View Answers

Yes.
8 (44.4%)

No.
10 (55.6%)

I'm more complicated than your radio buttons, and will explain this in a comment.
0 (0.0%)

ratcreature: RatCreature is bored. (bored)
Poll #5487 your pets opinion on fireworks
Open to: Registered Users, detailed results viewable to: All, participants: 22


Are your pets freaked out by the New Year's Eve fireworks noises?

View Answers

Yes.
10 (45.5%)

No.
8 (36.4%)

Your radio buttons oppress me.
4 (18.2%)



My rats don't mind the fireworks. In general all of my rats have always been very zen about any kind of noise outside, but very easily startled by sudden noises inside. So outside there can be shouting, sirens, fireworks, and they don't care, but if I drop something for example, they run and hide.
ratcreature: RatCreature as Steampunk character (steampunk)
If I was considering to make some faux-documentary Sanctuary fanart, like the kind I was looking for a few days ago (and unfortuantely haven't come across so far), which kind of creature should I do a Sanctuary style abnormal file for? I'm thinking of something along the line of artifacts we see in the opening credits: Files on an abnormal, like documentation of it and stuff, or maybe journal entries with sketches, or historical accounts or something like that.

I have browsed wikipedia for inspiration and possible candidates for things that might suit as basis for abnormals in the Sanctuary universe:

Poll #5447 ideas for Sanctuary abnormals
Open to: Registered Users, detailed results viewable to: All, participants: 5


Which of these do you think would make a good abnormal case file?

View Answers

Mothman
3 (60.0%)

Hippocamp
3 (60.0%)

Pig-faced Women
1 (20.0%)

Green Man
2 (40.0%)

Blemmyes
1 (20.0%)

Selkie
1 (20.0%)

something else I'll mention in a comment
0 (0.0%)

ratcreature: RL? What RL? RatCreature is a net addict.  (what rl?)
My latest tedious digital experience made me curious about the "time efficiency" of digital vs. traditional media for people overall. Obviously there are some things that are really easy/fast digitally compared to doing it by hand, e.g. messing with the color balance, or after you are almost finished with the details it becomes apparent that you failed to notice that a head is disproportionately large. Select and scale with some minor re-merging effort is all fixing the latter takes digitally, whereas you have to start over by hand. But when looking at the whole process I often find that doing something digitally takes me longer than on paper (and I'm slow there already), even if I take into account the beloved undo and that corrections go much faster. Of course that could be just a matter of practice, but then it's not as if I paint traditionally all that often either, and digital stuff seems to have a really steep and frustrating learning curve.

Of course you can always mix both to take advantage, e.g. do a sketch in pencil, scan it, resize and rearrange stuff digitally, then base the drawing on that, or do an initial rough color sketch digitally, mess around with color sliders until you like the mood, then do the painting traditionally, then scan it and do a touch up digitally etc. But still, a poll about when you don't mix the two.

Poll #5337 traditional vs. digital
Open to: Registered Users, detailed results viewable to: All, participants: 5


for initial sketching (whether a study or the base of later picture), what is faster for you?

View Answers

traditional media (i.e. physical pigments applied to surfaces in some manner)
3 (60.0%)

digital (i.e. whatever software you like best for a task: GIMP, Photoshop, Painter, ArtRage...)
1 (20.0%)

no difference
1 (20.0%)

don't know/can't say (b/c you never keep track of time, have only ever used one method for this, always mix both...)
0 (0.0%)

for a fully rendered drawing, what is faster for you? (presuming about equally detailed/skilled results are the goal)

View Answers

traditional
1 (20.0%)

digital
3 (60.0%)

no difference
1 (20.0%)

don't know
0 (0.0%)

for inking line art, what is faster for you?

View Answers

traditional
2 (40.0%)

digital
3 (60.0%)

no difference
0 (0.0%)

don't know
0 (0.0%)

for coloring line art, what is faster for you?

View Answers

traditional
1 (20.0%)

digital
4 (80.0%)

no difference
0 (0.0%)

don't know
0 (0.0%)

for a fully rendered painting, what is faster for you?

View Answers

traditional
2 (40.0%)

digital
1 (20.0%)

no difference
0 (0.0%)

don't know
2 (40.0%)

how important is such time/effort efficiency on average when choosing your medium for an artwork? 10 meaning "most important", 0 meaning "not important" compared to other consideration (e.g. wanting to have a physical object, not wanting to have a mess with paints everywhere, having some effect you can only get digitally etc.)

View Answers
Mean: 3.20 Median: 3 Std. Dev 1.33
0
0 (0.0%)
1
1 (20.0%)
2
0 (0.0%)
3
2 (40.0%)
4
1 (20.0%)
5
1 (20.0%)
6
0 (0.0%)
7
0 (0.0%)
8
0 (0.0%)
9
0 (0.0%)
10
0 (0.0%)
ratcreature: navel-gazing RatCreature (navel-gazing)
With my last acrylic painting I tried for the first time to skip the lineart inking, and now I'm wondering which version of my style viewers like better, if they have a preference at all, i.e. without inked lineart like in this Star Trek art, or with inked lineart like for example in this SGA art or pretty much any color art I've done before.

Poll #5136 lineart: to ink or not to ink
Open to: Registered Users, detailed results viewable to: All, participants: 18


Which lineart style do you prefer for my fanart paintings?

View Answers

lineart inked in black (like the SGA example)
3 (16.7%)

lineart not inked (like the ST example)
10 (55.6%)

no preference
5 (27.8%)

ratcreature: RatCreature begs, holding a sign, that says: Will work for food, with "food" crossed out and replaced with  "comics". (work)
Poll #4781 the price to feed yourself
Open to: Registered Users, detailed results viewable to: All, participants: 42


How much money do you spend on food per week per person? (in an average week, eating your average food, not an exceptional one with a holiday feast or a dinner treat at an for you unusually fancy restaurant or the like)

View Answers

less than 20 € (currently exchanged to about 27.50 US$ or so or 17.50 UK£, convert € below accordingly, though I realize the exchange rate vagaries don't reflect local purchasing power for stuff like food necessarily)
4 (9.5%)

20-30 €
11 (26.2%)

30-40 €
11 (26.2%)

40-50 €
3 (7.1%)

50-60 €
5 (11.9%)

60-70 €
1 (2.4%)

70-80 €
2 (4.8%)

90-100 €
3 (7.1%)

100-120 €
2 (4.8%)

120-140 €
0 (0.0%)

140-160 €
0 (0.0%)

160-180 €
0 (0.0%)

180-200 €
0 (0.0%)

200-250 €
0 (0.0%)

250-300 €
0 (0.0%)

more than 300 €
0 (0.0%)

ratcreature: X-Mas: RatCreature as Santa. (xmas)
Now that the Christmas cookies have been around in stores for weeks, and the holiday exchange post frequency heats up on my dwircle/flist, it occurred to me that maybe I should think earlier about individualized holiday cards for my family, because last year I did none, and my online sort of holiday art was posted on the 28th.

However that reminded me of said holiday art, a Santa!Cthulhu, which I still find quite neat to look at, and I wondered whether anyone would think it fun to have it as a motif on one of these easy merchandise sites (like Zazzle or the like? I've never used any such site) that offer to create prints and cards and stuff. Hence this poll:

Poll #4778 a multitude of Santa!Cthulhus?
Open to: Registered Users, detailed results viewable to: All, participants: 4


What do you think of Santa!Cthulhu as merchandise motif?

View Answers

Could be fun. I might even consider getting something with it if circumstances were right/I needed a Christmas card/...
3 (75.0%)

That seems all quite complicated and costs too much. If I wanted a Santa!Cthulhu card, I'd just email you and ask for the hi-res file to print it myself.
1 (25.0%)

Eh, don't bother. It's not great as a motif and Cthulhus are overdone anyway.
0 (0.0%)



(ETA: I probably should have included some "I don't celebrate Christmas/don't care for some other reason." option, but then you'll just have to resist the lure of the ticky...)

In other holiday-related news: I got my Yuletart assignment, yay! (Though, omg, why aren't people more specific in their wishes than their favorite characters?? I wrote half an essay detailing my preferences, so long in fact that I had a shortened version in my comment and then linked a yuletart letter post!)
ratcreature: RatCreature is thinking: hmm...? (hmm...?)
I'm curious what kind of fanart styles/types people like best for live action fandoms. For the purpose of this poll assume that the artist is skilled at the style in question, e.g. just because there are a ton of badly done "my hed iz pastede on" photomanips that shouldn't count against the style as such, if you can appreciate well done manips of that type. For this poll consider 0="don't like the style at all" and 5="like this style very much".

Poll #4052 What fanart styles do you like in live action fandoms?
Open to: Registered Users, detailed results viewable to: All, participants: 49


artwork in traditional media that is very realistic in style and used identifiable promo/screencap images as reference, e.g. many realist character portrait paintings/drawings or collage paintings that merge several portrait images for effect (like a collage of canon h/c scenes)

View Answers
Mean: 2.57 Median: 3 Std. Dev 1.32
0
4 (8.2%)
1
5 (10.2%)
2
15 (30.6%)
3
13 (26.5%)
4
8 (16.3%)
5
4 (8.2%)

the same but done with digital media, e.g. "paintovers" and such

View Answers
Mean: 2.10 Median: 2 Std. Dev 1.42
0
8 (16.3%)
1
10 (20.4%)
2
11 (22.4%)
3
11 (22.4%)
4
7 (14.3%)
5
2 (4.1%)

artwork in traditional media that is very realistic in style but shows fully imaginary scenes rather than character portraits and drawings based canon scenes

View Answers
Mean: 4.14 Median: 4 Std. Dev 0.99
0
0 (0.0%)
1
1 (2.0%)
2
1 (2.0%)
3
12 (24.5%)
4
11 (22.4%)
5
24 (49.0%)

the same but done with digital media

View Answers
Mean: 4.06 Median: 4 Std. Dev 1.13
0
1 (2.0%)
1
1 (2.0%)
2
1 (2.0%)
3
11 (22.4%)
4
12 (24.5%)
5
23 (46.9%)

artwork in traditional media that is basically still realist (e.g. in proportions etc.) but more stylized, e.g. characters rendered in art noveau style, a realistic comic style etc.

View Answers
Mean: 4.45 Median: 5 Std. Dev 0.83
0
0 (0.0%)
1
0 (0.0%)
2
2 (4.1%)
3
5 (10.2%)
4
11 (22.4%)
5
31 (63.3%)

the same but done with digital media

View Answers
Mean: 4.35 Median: 5 Std. Dev 1.04
0
1 (2.0%)
1
0 (0.0%)
2
2 (4.1%)
3
5 (10.2%)
4
11 (22.4%)
5
30 (61.2%)

manga-style artwork

View Answers
Mean: 2.90 Median: 3 Std. Dev 1.40
0
3 (6.2%)
1
6 (12.5%)
2
8 (16.7%)
3
13 (27.1%)
4
12 (25.0%)
5
6 (12.5%)

cartoony artwork

View Answers
Mean: 3.69 Median: 4 Std. Dev 1.26
0
1 (2.1%)
1
2 (4.2%)
2
5 (10.4%)
3
11 (22.9%)
4
13 (27.1%)
5
16 (33.3%)

photomanips of the collage-type, e.g. multiple pictures from canon and non-canon sources are arranged, layered, changed with textures etc.

View Answers
Mean: 2.16 Median: 2 Std. Dev 1.40
0
6 (12.2%)
1
13 (26.5%)
2
8 (16.3%)
3
14 (28.6%)
4
5 (10.2%)
5
3 (6.1%)

photomanips of the type that merges/blends pictures into a single non-collage image, e.g. putting characters in period costumes, giving characters wings, head/body mergers to get explicit art etc.

View Answers
Mean: 2.18 Median: 2 Std. Dev 1.38
0
7 (14.3%)
1
10 (20.4%)
2
9 (18.4%)
3
15 (30.6%)
4
6 (12.2%)
5
2 (4.1%)

digital artwork that is not painted or manipped but primarily 3D rendered

View Answers
Mean: 1.49 Median: 1 Std. Dev 1.24
0
13 (28.9%)
1
10 (22.2%)
2
12 (26.7%)
3
7 (15.6%)
4
3 (6.7%)
5
0 (0.0%)


ETA: I probably should have been more precise in that what I'm curious about is preferences for styles of 2D, non-moving picture-type fanart; the phrasing was not meant to imply that things like fannish fiber crafts, sculpture or vidding or other arts weren't "fanart".
ratcreature: navel-gazing RatCreature (navel-gazing)
Some years ago I posted some scans of a superhero drawing book, specifically from chapters where it explains drawing women. That post is widely linked, and google brings it up fairly high up when you search for "how to draw comics" and the like. This results in me still getting a steady stream of comments that range from clueless to horrible sexist drivel or worse.

Now LJ offers you the option to lock comments without deleting or hiding the old ones, and having once again an sexist idiot rant at me today (in multiple comments even, I assume the person didn't notice the comment field telling them I log IP addresses), I am considering to freeze comments there. In general I like to keep comments open, and normally I like getting comments on older posts, and every once in a while I get and interesting one even on that post, but is that worth getting enraged every so often? (I usually don't react anymore, but since I screen anon comments to weed out spam, I have to at least glance at their drivel.) The comments are an illuminating display of fail from certain segments of comic fandom, but then we all know about that already, so there is really not that much need to have them enact it over and over again in my years old post.

So I'm waffling, and wondering what you think.

Poll #2698 moderation question
Open to: Registered Users, detailed results viewable to: All, participants: 24


Should I freeze comments in that post?

View Answers

Yes.
23 (95.8%)

No.
1 (4.2%)

ratcreature: RatCreature is thinking: hmm...? (hmm...?)
I'm curious, how many, if any, WIPs do you currently follow? Also which they are, especially if they are in one of my current main fandoms, to see whether I'm missing anything good. I know not everyone likes WIPs, so obviously this is not the post for WIP haters. I like following WIPs along, which has become obvious to me once again now that I read ST: Reboot, where WIPs seem more common than they are in SGA, so the number I keep track of has increased greatly in a short time.

So here's the list of WIPs I currently follow, i.e. WIPs I subscribe to updates for or regularly check (I stopped reading some HP WIPs I used to follow, because currently I'm not much interested in HP, so I'm not listing those). For simplicity it's just title and author with a link, as these are not recs, though I recced some before, and obviously want to know what happens next for all of them:

cut for length )
That were actually fewer than I thought, though I may have forgotten some.
Poll #2497 do you follow (m)any WIPs?
Open to: Registered Users, detailed results viewable to: All, participants: 39


How many WIPs do you follow?

View Answers

none
5 (12.8%)

none in principle, but there is that one special story I broke my no-WIPs rule for...
8 (20.5%)

a few (say less than ten)
16 (41.0%)

more than a few but not that many (say more than ten but less than 25)
4 (10.3%)

more than 25 but (probably) less than 100
2 (5.1%)

more than 100
0 (0.0%)

more than 200
0 (0.0%)

too many for me to keep track the number even approximately
2 (5.1%)

I have no idea how many, but not because the number is too large
2 (5.1%)

ratcreature: grumpy (grumpy)
The object of today's curiosity is signatures added to blog and journal posts. In particular the practice I've encountered in some blogs (mostly non-fandom) to include random religious scripture excerpts at the bottom of every post, even if the blog itself has no obvious religious content or otherwise preachy slant or anything like that. I tend to find this vaguely annoying, and usually won't subscribe then, even if I otherwise might have. Case in point, just now I came across one of those "a painting a day" blogs, and the art looked nice enough, but I find signature quotes that are unrelated to the content of the post annoying more often than not in general (especially the picture sigs on some message boards, I'd actually take preachy ones over those), but these seem even more obnoxious to me.

I understand that for some faiths there exists some sort of obligation to spread their words or something like that -- I vaguely remember that from confirmation classes at least -- but does it have to be in your art blog posts? It's not like I'm about to be converted by these. So now I'm curious: Do others like/dislike this kind of thing? Are indifferent? Maybe you overlook them, like with ad-blindness? Thus a poll:

Poll #2288 religious signatures?
Open to: Registered Users, detailed results viewable to: All, participants: 40


What is your reaction to religious quotes as blog signatures?

View Answers

I like them.
0 (0.0%)

I like them only if they are from my religion.
0 (0.0%)

I don't mind them/just overlook them.
10 (25.0%)

I dislike them.
28 (70.0%)

Your radio buttons are oppressing me.
2 (5.0%)

ratcreature: RatCreature enjoys food: yum! (food)
I am curious: When you are cooking, and tasting things, how careful are you not to get any of your saliva into the food? I.e. do you always meticulously use two spoons, or are there circumstances when you don't bother and put the same spoon you had in your mouth in contact with the food again?

Poll #2231 slobber poll
Open to: Registered Users, detailed results viewable to: All, participants: 52


How do you taste food when cooking?

View Answers

I always use two spoons, anything else would be unhygienic/disgusting/getting into bad habits...
1 (1.9%)

I only use two spoons when I cook for others, I don't bother when I'm cooking just for myself, and I'm the only one eating the food anyway.
14 (26.9%)

It depends on some other circumstances (like cooking for family vs. guests, whether I'm sick and potentially infectious,...)
20 (38.5%)

I never bother using extra spoons, such a tiny amount of saliva transfer has never harmed anyone.
17 (32.7%)

ratcreature: Procrastination is a Lifestyle. RatCreature in a hammock doing nothing. (procrastination)
As another decade ends (I can't believe it's going to be 2010 in just a few days. yikes!) you see all the usual retrospectives etc.; also I've been editing fanlore (and you should too, the wiki needs more people /end shameless plug). This led me to wonder: if you've been in fandom a long(-ish) time, do you ever feel nostalgia for fandom how it used to be? ("Fandom" in this case intentionally vague as I just mean whatever form of fandom you were involved in the era you are nostalgic for.) And if so, for which time period? So I thought I'd do a poll.

The first is a question of whether you feel nostalgia, and in the second you can check tickyboxes to indicate for which time period you are feeling nostalgia. That I have split into two options for each period for an indication whether you actually were in fandom in that time period and feel nostalgia due to firsthand experience, or feel nostaligia because you have read or heard about that time and wish you had been in fandom then, because it just sounds more awesome to you than fandom now. I did give up to the early 2000s as options to feel nostalgia for, though I am a bit dubious whether you can call it "nostalgia" proper if it's less than ten years ago.
fandom nostalgia poll, cut to spare your f-list )
ratcreature: TMI! RatCreature is embarrassed while holding up a dildo. (tmi)
I've been reading a slash story in which a heated argument between the couple (who are also friends) results in punch being thrown, and then the one punched actually finds the aggression a turn on and it goes on to sex. Somehow this combination of sex and violence doesn't work for me at all, not even in fiction, where I'm not averse to combinations of sex and violence.

Like, I can go along fine if the aggression is against some kind of third party, and one character is turned on by the other being violent, or they are turned on mutually, say if they are both in a barfight or even slaughter others. I can also go along with non-con that involves violence with the victim not being turned on, but I as a reader like it. But if the violence is between the couple (and they are supposed to like each other), uncontrolled violence segueing into sex (rather than say rough sex that is mutually agreed upon) is squicky for me, more so if the violence is not mutual (the latter would be more fighting leading to fucking in some kind of hate sex, which I also don't like, but it is not as bad as one sided violence).

Most often this is shown from the POV of the character the aggression is turned upon rather than the violent character being turned on by the escalation, i.e. A hits B, usually after some provocation, then B somehow finds that aggression/violence (or sometimes the loss of control) hot, and sex follows. I have to admit that I find this particular combination of sex and violence to be surprising as a kink, and it always startles me, but I see this every now and then, and I'm wondering whether it is something that many people like in sex scenes.

So, a poll:

Poll #1787 fictional sex & violence, when are they like hazelnuts and chocolate?
Open to: Registered Users, detailed results viewable to: All, participants: 130


Which combinations of sex & violence do you like in fiction?

View Answers

none
15 (11.5%)

violence against outsiders is a turn-on for the characters, and followed by sex between them
76 (58.5%)

consensual, planned violence between partners (e.g. agreed upon rough sex, with bruising or hitting)
102 (78.5%)

unplanned, but mutual violence against each other (with both being equally aggressive/violent) then leads to sex
89 (68.5%)

unplanned, violent aggression (e.g. during an escalating argument) of character A against their partner B is a turn-on for B, and then leads to sex
34 (26.2%)

unplanned, violent aggression (e.g. during an escalating argument) of character A against their partner B is a turn-on for A, and then leads to sex
15 (11.5%)

violence with non-con sex
32 (24.6%)

ratcreature: RatCreature as Spock (trek)
So, I have been sucked into the the ST:AOS fandom, and I feel the need for having more Star Trek icons. I've had my Spock icon for a long time, and also have a Borg which, while not all that suitable for the TOS/AOS time period, aptly describes being assimilated into a new fandom. But now I'm considering to make an Uhura icon.

The snag I've run into is that I'm not sure which hairstyle I should choose. For rather obvious reason with my icon theme "resemblance" for a character depends a lot on things like associated symbols, tools, clothes and hairstyle. While I intend to use it for the new movie fandom, I somehow feel that TOS Uhura's hairstyle would be more recognizable to represent the character. So what do you think?

Poll #518 iconic hairstyles
This poll is closed.
Open to: Registered Users, detailed results viewable to: All, participants: 19


Which hairstyle should I pick for an Uhura!RatCreature icon?

View Answers

her TOS hairstyle
14 (73.7%)

her AOS/Reboot hairstyle
5 (26.3%)

December 2022

S M T W T F S
     1 2 3
4 56 78910
11 121314 1516 17
18 192021222324
25262728293031

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 26th, 2025 09:28 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios